Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504328›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025

Cardiovascular Care in Women Veterans: An Updated Profile.

Pristine Mei, Delia Cotiga, Ingy Mahana, Nimra Gilani, Michelle L Dew, Susmita Parashar, D Elizabeth Le

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pristine MeiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Delia CotigaDepartment of Medicine, New Jersey Medical School, University Hospital, Rutgers Health, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ingy MahanaKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Nimra GilaniDepartment of Medicine, New Jersey Medical School, East Orange VA Medical Center, Rutgers Health, East Orange, NJ, USA.
Michelle L DewAdvent Health Shawnee Mission Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Department, Shawnee Mission, Merriam, KS, USA.
Susmita ParasharDivision of Cardiology, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
D Elizabeth LeDivision of Cardiology, Portland Veterans Administration Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA. lee@ohsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo provide an updated summary of the burden and care of cardiovascular disease in women veterans. RECENT

findingsWomen veterans can develop atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at a much earlier age of 30 years compared to non-veteran women. Those who experienced chronic stress and environmental exposures were more likely to develop early menopause and premature coronary artery disease. Despite major improvements in therapeutic options for cardiovascular disease, the mortality rate of women veterans continues to rise while that of their counterparts has steadily decreased. Women veterans is the fastest growing group of the veteran population. This is a unique and diverse population with a complex intersection of traditional, sex-specific, and military service-related risks for cardiovascular disease. They have a higher prevalence of both traditional and non-traditional risk factors compared to non-veteran women and are especially impacted by depression, post-traumatic stress syndrome, military sexual trauma, and housing instability.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesVeteransWomen's HealthFemaleHumansRisk FactorsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticUnited StatesCardiovascular diseaseMilitary service-related exposuresVeteran-specific risksWomen veterans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.