Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Improving shared decision‑making between paediatric haematologists, children with sickle cell disease, and their parents: an observational post-intervention study.
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) suffer from a chronic disease that can lead to serious co-morbidity and impacts their quality of life. During the course of their disease, a variety of health-related decisions need to be made for and by SCD-patients, depending on their age and health status, together with their parents and paediatric haematology clinicians. Shared decision-making (SDM) may improve health outcomes of chronically ill children but is still not commonly applied. We assessed the level of SDM among paediatric haematologists after the introduction of SDM interventions. An observational post-intervention study was conducted in a paediatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital. After an SDM consultation training of the three paediatric haematologists and introduction of SDM-supporting tools for both paediatricians and (parents of) patients with SCD, two evaluators independently and objectively analysed the level of patient involvement in decision-making from audio-recordings of the consultations using the OPTION-5 instrument. SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc questionnaires were used to measure the level of SDM as perceived by patients/parents and paediatricians, respectively. Scores were expressed as a percentage, ranging from 0% (no SDM observed) to 100% (exemplary level of SDM). Participants were 9 female and 9 male patients between 4 months and 17 years old, with a median age of 7.5 years (Interquartile Range [IQR] 2.5-12). Eighteen consultations (six per paediatrician) in which a decision was to be made about SCD treatment options were analysed. Median OPTION-5 score was 50 (IQR 40-65%). Median SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc scores were 73% (IQR 52.2-91) and 62.2% (IQR 55.6-71.1), respectively.
conclusionAfter the introduction of SDM training and tools, paediatric haematologists reached a moderately good level of SDM. This level had doubled as compared to the baseline level, as assessed in a previous study. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Children who suffer from sickle cell disease (SCD) are vulnerable to health inequities and suboptimal health outcomes. Hence, SDM seems an appropriate method of care for these children. • SDM tools and training may help paediatricians and children participate in a collaborative decision-making process about the children's preferred treatment options and improve their health outcomes. WHAT IS NEW: • After SDM training and decision support aids for paediatricians and patients, the level of involvement in the decision-making process by (the parents of) patients suffering from SCD reached a moderately good level. • A difference persists between paediatricians' perceived level of involving the child and parents in a shared decision-making process and the observed level of involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.