ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Subject-specific variability in cerebrospinal fluid flow characteristics through cerebral aqueducts in a healthy population: a magnetic resonance imaging and computational investigation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow and Vorticity in Hydrocephalus on 4-Dimensional Flow MRI.Neurosurgery practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow has bi-directional flow profiles synchronized with cardiac pulsation. The increase in CSF stroke volume through the aqueduct (flow pathway between the third and fourth ventricle) is believed to be a biomarker of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). However, several studies have reported that CSF stroke volume varies considerably even in healthy populations. To explore these variations from a fluid mechanics perspective, this study analyzed CSF flow characteristics in healthy individuals using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based computational simulations. MRI data from 47 healthy subjects were acquired, and the maximum Reynolds number of the CSF flow through the aqueduct and the degree of CSF mixing were evaluated. Results showed that the Reynolds number of the CSF flow through the aqueduct was 28.6 ± 13.3, and the limited variation suggested fluid mechanical similarities of CSF flow characteristics in the healthy population. A positive correlation between CSF flow mixing and the Reynolds number was observed in both healthy populations and iNPH patients. These findings demonstrate that CSF flow through the aqueduct, especially in healthy populations, can be well characterized by examining fluid mechanical similarities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.