ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Unilateral approach to bilateral middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a large series and a proposed grading system to predict technical difficulties.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study includes the surgical treatment of 31 patients with bilateral MCA (bMCA) aneurysms using a unilateral approach and is the second largest series in the literature. The main aim of this study is to present a proposed grading system to preoperatively predict the difficulties in this approach. The clinical files, radiological studies, operation records, intraoperative video recordings, complications and outcomes of 31 patients were retrospectively reviewed. In the first part of this study (2001-2010), we operated on 22 patients with bMCA aneurysms and were able to clip the contralateral aneurysm via unilateral approach in only 12 cases (54.5%). Considering our experience from the surgery of these patients, we identified 5 parameters that reveal surgical difficulties. In the second part of the study (2011-2023), considering these 5 parameters, 20 patients were selected for unilateral approach and bilateral aneurysms could be clipped in 19 patients (95%). As a result, 26 of 31 patients (83.9%) were discharged with a favorable outcome (mRS 0-2, excellent-good). Intraoperative rupture occurred in one patient. Based on our experience, we developed a grading system with a total of 10 points by assigning points according to the degree of difficulty of each parameter and classified surgical difficulty as follows: 0-1 low difficulty, 2-3 moderate difficulty, 4-6 high difficulty and 7-10 very high difficulty. Patients with bMCA aneurysms can be operated via unilateral approach in experienced hands in properly selected cases. This grading system may help the neurosurgeon in this selection by preoperatively predicting intraoperative difficulties. This study is a completely retrospective file scan. This is not a clinical trial. Clinical trial number: not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.