Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504282›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025

The use of Bevacizumab in the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review.

Asfand Baig Mirza, Feras Fayez, Marwan Al-Munaer, Ariadni Georgiannakis, Layla Burn, Karthik Ravi, Amisha Vastani, Christoforos Syrris, Jash Patel, Samir Matloob

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Asfand Baig Mirza *Neurosurgery Department, Queens Hospital, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, Barking, Romford, UK. Asfand.mirza@nhs.net.
Feras Fayez *Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0103-9500
Marwan Al-MunaerHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Ariadni GeorgiannakisBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Layla BurnBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Karthik RaviStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Amisha VastaniCharing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Christoforos SyrrisDepartment of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jash PatelNeurosurgery Department, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Samir MatloobNeurosurgery Department, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) are high-flow vascular anomalies associated with a significant risk of intracranial haemorrhage, particularly in young individuals. Standard treatments-including microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and endovascular embolization-are not feasible for all patients, especially those with high-grade or surgically inaccessible lesions. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has emerged as a potential medical therapy aimed at modulating angiogenesis and managing post-treatment complications. This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024563735). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Medline was performed up to March 2024, using terms related to Bevacizumab and brain AVMs. Studies were included if they involved adult patients with intracranial AVMs and were published in English. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, and quality was assessed using NIH tools.Twelve studies met inclusion criteria, comprising pilot trials, case series, and case reports. One study investigated Bevacizumab as a standalone treatment for inoperable bAVMs, demonstrating safety but no reduction in nidus volume. The remaining studies assessed Bevacizumab in the management of radiation-induced complications-including necrosis and steroid-resistant oedema-following SRS. Across these, Bevacizumab was consistently associated with clinical and radiological improvements and had a favourable safety profile, though most studies were limited by small sample sizes and lack of control groups. There is insufficient evidence to support Bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for bAVMs. However, early data suggest it may play a valuable adjunctive role in managing post-SRS complications. Future research should include larger, controlled studies with diverse patient populations, varied dosing regimens, and long-term follow-up to better define its therapeutic potential and positioning within the bAVM treatment paradigm.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsHumansRadiosurgeryTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.