Observational studyInternational ophthalmology2025
Predictive value of short-term steroid intraocular pressure elevation testing for long-term steroid intraocular pressure elevation in diabetic macular edema treatment.
Observational study in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to investigate whether there is a correlation between intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TA) testing and IOP response following fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant injection in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.
methodsThis study employed a real-world observational cohort retrospective design, enrolling patients who had received at least one intravitreal TA injection prior to a FAc implant injection between December 2018 and July 2022. Demographic data, medical and ophthalmic history were collected at baseline. Mean IOP was assessed before and after both treatments and steroid-response was defined as an IOP greater than 21 mmHg. Statistical analysis was performed to determine correlated IOP changes.
resultsA total of 28 eyes were included in the study. Six eyes exhibited a steroid response following the initial TA injection, and none of these eyes demonstrated a steroid response following the FAc implant. The FAc implant resulted in steroid response in six additional eyes. The analysis revealed no statistically significant correlation between the occurrence of a steroid response following a TA injection and the subsequent mean IOP progression following an FAc implant injection at any time point. No correlation was observed between the variation in IOP following the two treatments.
conclusionIt is crucial to evaluate the necessity of a prior short-acting steroid challenge, which carries the risk of multiple disease relapses, given the potential for a prolonged and stable steroid to provide superior control. The predictive value of the test with TA was not evident in our sample, suggesting some usefulness in delaying treatment with the FAc implant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.