Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504250›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2025

Buccal versus Vaginal Graft Urethroplasty in Female Urethral Stricture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Lalit Kumar, Anuja Thakur, Sakshi Agarwal, Mahesh Khairnar, Sameer Trivedi, Satya Narain Shankhwar

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lalit Kumar *Department of Urology (Urogynecology Subspecialty), Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Anuja Thakur *Department of Urology (Urogynecology Subspecialty), Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Sakshi AgarwalDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. sakshi@bhu.ac.in.
Mahesh KhairnarFaculty of Dental Science, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Sameer TrivediDepartment of Urology (Urogynecology Subspecialty), Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Satya Narain ShankhwarDepartment of Urology (Urogynecology Subspecialty), Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Funding

Banaras Hindu University IOE 6031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis study is aimed at comparing success rate, maximum flow rate (Q

methodsA systematic review was performed in April 2024, including retrospective, prospective, and comparative studies excluding duplicates, review, editorial comments, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and therapeutic indications. Heterogeneity in the meta-analysis was assessed using I

resultsThe meta-analysis incorporated a quantitative assessment of 18 original articles. The studies in meta-analysis evaluated various parameters, including Q

conclusionsMeta-analysis indicates no significant differences between VWG and BMG regarding Q

Indexed as

Mouth MucosaUrethraUrethral StrictureVaginaFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeAugmentation urethroplastyBuccal mucosal graftFemale urethral strictureMaximum flow ratePost-void residual volumeVaginal wall graft

Identifiers

PMID40504250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.