Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40504155›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Representation of locomotive action affordances in human behavior, brains, and deep neural networks.

Clemens G Bartnik, Christina Sartzetaki, Abel Puigseslloses Sanchez, Elijah Molenkamp, Steven Bommer, Nikolina Vukšić, Iris I A Groen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Representation of locomotive action affordances in human behavior, brains, and deep neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clemens G BartnikInformatics Institute, Video and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098 XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-7528-8068
Christina SartzetakiInformatics Institute, Video and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098 XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0009-2057-5614
Abel Puigseslloses SanchezInformatics Institute, Video and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098 XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0001-1436-5380
Elijah MolenkampInformatics Institute, Video and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098 XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-2164-3824
Steven BommerInformatics Institute, Video and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098 XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-3668-3088
Nikolina VukšićInformatics Institute, Video and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098 XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5616-618X
Iris I A GroenInformatics Institute, Video and Image Sense Lab, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098 XH, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5536-6128

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO) VI.Veni.194030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To decide how to move around the world, we must determine which locomotive actions (e.g., walking, swimming, or climbing) are afforded by the immediate visual environment. The neural basis of our ability to recognize locomotive affordances is unknown. Here, we compare human behavioral annotations, functional MRI (fMRI) measurements, and deep neural network (DNN) activations to both indoor and outdoor real-world images to demonstrate that the human visual cortex represents locomotive action affordances in complex visual scenes. Hierarchical clustering of behavioral annotations of six possible locomotive actions show that humans group environments into distinct affordance clusters using at least three separate dimensions. Representational similarity analysis of multivoxel fMRI responses in the scene-selective visual cortex shows that perceived locomotive affordances are represented independently from other scene properties such as objects, surface materials, scene category, or global properties and independent of the task performed in the scanner. Visual feature activations from DNNs trained on object or scene classification as well as a range of other visual understanding tasks correlate comparatively lower with behavioral and neural representations of locomotive affordances than with object representations. Training DNNs directly on affordance labels or using affordance-centered language embeddings increases alignment with human behavior, but none of the tested models fully captures locomotive action affordance perception. These results uncover a type of representation in the human brain that reflects locomotive action affordances.

Indexed as

BrainLocomotionNeural Networks, ComputerVisual CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleVisual PerceptionYoung Adultaffordancesdeep neural networkslocomotionscene-selective visual cortex

Identifiers

PMID40504155
PMCPMC12184334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.