ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2025
Implementing an undergraduate learning assistant model to foster engagement and professional development in microbiology courses.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maximizing the Value of Learning Assistants for Students' Belonging, Mattering, and Confidence in Gateway STEM Courses.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
- Examination of undergraduate learning assistants' science communication and science teaching approaches.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2026Article
- Not just an afterthought: the essentiality of professional development for STEM teaching assistants.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
- An undergraduate learning assistant perspective on career development.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Integrating undergraduate learning assistants (ULAs) into high-enrollment science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses has been shown to enhance student engagement, yet the impact on ULAs themselves remains underexplored. This manuscript presents a field-tested framework for implementing and sustaining a structured ULA program in a General Microbiology course, offering a replicable model for educators seeking to enhance student learning and ULA professional development (PD). Over the past decade, this program has been refined to provide structured mentorship, leadership opportunities, and active involvement in both in-class and out-of-class activities. The ULA program fosters student engagement by incorporating active learning strategies such as iClicker questions, group exams, and flipped classroom exercises, ensuring a collaborative and supportive learning environment. At the same time, ULAs develop critical skills in communication, teamwork, assessment, and pedagogy, which align with key PD objectives. Faculty observations indicate that students who engage with ULAs exhibit increased conceptual understanding, participation, and peer collaboration. Likewise, anonymous ULA feedback highlights significant growth in teaching confidence, leadership, and academic preparedness. This article serves as a practical guide for educators by outlining a structured, adaptable curriculum, detailing strategies for faculty mentoring, and providing implementation best practices. While formal assessment of learning gains is ongoing, preliminary findings suggest that ULAs serve as valuable instructional assets while simultaneously benefiting from the experience. This dual impact underscores the importance of structured ULA programs in enhancing undergraduate education and preparing future educators and professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.