Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503830›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025

Insights into the occurrence of rabies viruses in multi-species animals based on diagnostic laboratory submissions.

Aurelle Yondo, Ben Enyetornye, Binu T Velayudhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aurelle YondoAthens Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Ben EnyetornyeAthens Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Binu T VelayudhanAthens Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0500-1841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a fatal zoonotic disease caused by the rabies virus (RABV), primarily affecting the central nervous system of mammals. Understanding the epidemiology of animal rabies is critical for developing effective prevention and control strategies. This study aimed to analyze animal rabies cases received at a veterinary diagnostic laboratory in Georgia, USA, over 5 years (2019-2023), focusing on the most commonly infected species, seasonality trends, and geographical distributions. A total of 1,560 rabies-suspect cases, representing 21 species of animals, were tested using a direct fluorescent antibody test (DFAT). Of 1,560 cases, 5.6% (88/1560) were positive across 11 species, with domestic animals accounting for 17% (15/88) of rabies cases, whereas wildlife species exhibited a higher occurrence of 83% (73/88). Among wildlife, the affected species were raccoons (35.2% [31/88]), skunks (25% [22/88]), white-tailed deer (8% [7/88]), foxes (6.8% [6/88]), bats (4.5% [4/88]), bobcats (2.3% [2/88]), and great kudu (1.1% [1/88]). In domestic animals, the affected species included bovine (6.8% [6/88]), feline (5.7% [5/88]), caprine (2.3% [2/88]), and equine (2.3% [2/88]). Positive cases were predominantly detected in submissions from Georgia, with a few additional cases identified in neighboring states and unknown locations. Furthermore, fall, spring, and summer seasons showed high infection rates compared with winter. Our findings highlight distinct seasonal trends and the significant burden of rabies among wildlife in the Southeastern United States.IMPORTANCERabies is a fatal zoonotic viral disease that affects the central nervous system of mammals including humans. It is transmitted mainly through bites or scratches by infected animals such as dogs, bats, raccoons, and other wild animals. The present study analyzed data on clinical specimens submitted to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory for the detection of rabies in domestic and wild animals for a period of 5 years. The study examined a total of 1,560 rabies-suspect cases, representing 21 species of animals tested using the standard direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) assay. Out of 1,560 cases, 5.6% were positive across 11 species, with domestic animals accounting for 17% and wild animals accounting for 83% of the total cases. Different species of wild animal species showed a significantly higher incidence of rabies, highlighting the importance of wildlife in spreading rabies to domestic animals and the threat it poses to public health.

Indexed as

RabiesRabies virusAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildCatsChiropteraDeerFluorescent Antibody Technique, DirectFoxesGeorgiaRaccoonsSeasonsZoonosesanimal healthdiagnostic laboratorymulti-speciesrabiesretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID40503830
PMCPMC12323658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.