Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503744›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2025

Evaluation of PE5 Entries on the Human Proteome Project Target List.

Clarissa Zheng, Marie Andken, Jonathan M Mudge, Michele Magrane, Sandra Orchard, Zhi Sun, Eric W Deutsch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clarissa ZhengInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-6339-779X
Marie AndkenInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.
Jonathan M MudgeEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-4789-7495
Michele MagraneEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-996X
Sandra OrchardEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8878-3972
Zhi SunInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3324-6851
Eric W DeutschInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington 98109, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8732-0928

Funding

GENCODE: comprehensive reference genome annotation for human and mouseU24HG007234 · NHGRI · EUROPEAN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY LABORATORY · PI Fergal James Martin · 2021 to 2026
$16.1M
Shortening the development cycle time of Trans Proteomic Pipeline tools with high performance computingR01GM087221 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI DEUTSCH, ERIC, MORITZ, ROBERT L · 2010 to 2021
$6.0M
Global proteomics mass spectrometry data sharing infrastructureR24GM148372 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Nuno Bandeira · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS U24 HG007234NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087221NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM148372Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One aim of the international Human Proteome Organization (HUPO) Human Proteome Project (HPP) is to obtain high-confidence translation evidence for every human protein-coding gene established in its target list of 19,433 entries based on the protein-coding genes from Ensembl-GENCODE. However, 76 are annotated in UniProtKB (as of release 2024_06) with PE5, indicating skepticism in the protein's existence from a manual curator, so it is unclear if these entries belong in the HPP target list. Here, we review these 76 entries by assembling evidence from the literature, reference databases, and genome alignments with other species to conclude whether these entries should be freed from their PE5 status to become annotated with PE1-4 in UniProtKB. We find that 17 of these have credible translation evidence and therefore should be upgraded to PE1. Another 15 lack translation evidence but have transcription evidence, the evolutionary hallmarks of protein-coding genes, and are presumed to produce functional proteins. 41 have no translational or transcriptional evidence, although they still bear the evolutionary hallmarks of protein-coding genes; currently, it remains unclear if these are protein-coding, so their representation becomes a matter of policy. Only 3 entries still seem best categorized as PE5 and excluded from the HUPO-HPP target list.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteomeProteomicsHumansProteomehuman proteomehuman proteome projectHUPOprotein evidence

Identifiers

PMID40503744
PMCPMC12459392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.