Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503674›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy2025

Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study.

Yi-Hsien Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Mon-Ting Chen, Hung-Hsiang Liou, Ming-Hsien Tsai

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi-Hsien ChenDepartment of Family Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, No. 95, Wen-Chang Rd, Shih-Lin Dist., Taipei 11101, Taiwan.
Yu-Wei FangDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, No. 95, Wen-Chang Rd, Shih-Lin Dist., Taipei 11101, Taiwan.
Mon-Ting ChenDepartment of Healthcare Management, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei 112303, Taiwan.
Hung-Hsiang LiouDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hsin-Jen Hospital, New Taipei City 242009, Taiwan.
Ming-Hsien TsaiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, No. 95, Wen-Chang Rd, Shih-Lin Dist., Taipei 11101, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-3561-4689

Funding

Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital 2024SKHADR020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsNonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as finerenone mitigate cardiorenal risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Real-world evidence comparing finerenone with spironolactone and eplerenone remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes in T2DM patients treated with finerenone vs. spironolactone or eplerenone using real-world data. METHODS AND

resultsA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network database. Adult patients with T2DM who were newly prescribed finerenone, spironolactone, or eplerenone were included (2021-2024). One-to-one propensity score matching was applied to eligible participants, resulting in 2957 finerenone users matching with spironolactone users and 1603 finerenone users matching with eplerenone users. Cardiovascular outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), heart failure, and mortality, were assessed over 24 months of follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression models. Finerenone users had significantly lower rates of MACE compared with spironolactone users (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66) and eplerenone (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.87). Mortality was also reduced with finerenone vs. spironolactone (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.35-0.57) and eplerenone (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.75). Heart failure events were fewer with finerenone than with spironolactone (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.90) and eplerenone (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99). Differences in acute myocardial infarction and stroke rates were not statistically significant.

conclusionFinerenone demonstrated superior cardiovascular outcomes compared with spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with T2DM with significant reductions in MACE, mortality, and heart failure events.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2EplerenoneMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNaphthyridinesSpironolactoneAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsEplerenonefinerenoneMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNaphthyridinesSpironolactoneCardiovascular outcomesHeart failureMortalityNonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonistsType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40503674
PMCPMC12582653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.