Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503604›Full record

SynthesisBJS open2025

Effect of the number of door openings in the operating room on surgical site infections: individual-patient data meta-analysis.

Hannah Groenen, Hasti Jalalzadeh, Nathan Bontekoning, Antoinette A A Bediako-Bowan, Dennis R Buis, Yasmine E M Dreissen, Anne M Eskes, Jon H M Goosen, Mingyang L Gray, Mitchel Griekspoor and 17 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Hannah GroenenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hasti JalalzadehDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nathan BontekoningDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Antoinette A A Bediako-BowanDepartment of Surgery, University of Ghana Medical School, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Dennis R BuisDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.
Yasmine E M DreissenDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.
Anne M EskesDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jon H M GoosenDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.
Mingyang L GrayDepartment of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Mitchel GriekspoorDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.
Brian L HollenbeckNew England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Frank F A IJpmaDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.
Maarten J van der LaanDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3125-1342
Appiah-Korang LabiDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-7276-7057
Nina M C MathijssenReinier Haga Orthopedisch Centrum, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.
Brett A MilesDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Northwell Cancer Institute, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA.
Kåre MølbakDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3100-4990
Ricardo G OrsiniDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Frederik J PrakkenDepartment of Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.
Roald R SchaadDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.
Patrique SegersDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7414-3712
Marius A StauningDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Wil C van der ZwetDutch National Guideline Group for Prevention of Postoperative Surgical Site Infections, the Netherlands.
Stijn W de JongeDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0693-3111
Niels WolfhagenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0573-5703
Gerjon HanninkDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marja A BoermeesterDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3890-8105

Funding

Dutch Stichting Kwaliteitsgelden Medisch Specialisten
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of door openings in the operating room on surgical site infections remains a controversial topic and has led to strict door-opening policies. The aim of this individual-patient data meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of the number of door openings in the operating room on surgical site infection.

methodsMEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase (Ovid) were searched up to 2 December 2024. Authors with individual-patient data on surgical site infections and door openings were invited to collaborate. A one-stage individual-patient data meta-analysis accounting for heterogeneity was performed to examine effects overall and in subgroup analyses (wound class, implant surgery, and income level). The primary outcome was surgical site infection. The risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework were used to determine the certainty of evidence.

resultsIndividual-patient data from 8 observational studies, encompassing 4412 patients, revealed a 6.0% incidence of surgical site infection. Each extra door opening per hour was associated with increased risk of surgical site infection (odds ratio 1.012, 95% c.i. 1.005 to 1.019; τ2 = 0.095; very low certainty of evidence). This means that, for example, at a baseline infection risk of 2%, approximately 35 additional door openings per hour per surgery would be needed to cause one additional surgical site infection per 100 patients. In subgroup analyses, no differences in effect were found. The cumulative effect was more pronounced in patients with a high baseline risk of surgical site infection.

conclusionVery low certainty of evidence suggests a marginal increase in the risk of surgical site infection for each additional door opening per hour. Although the relative effect is minimal, the cumulative effect has an impact on patients with a higher baseline surgical site infection risk more than others. However, the certainty of the available evidence is too low and the relative effect on clinical outcomes too small to support a rigorous zero door-openings policy to reduce rates of surgical site infections.

Indexed as

Operating RoomsSurgical Wound InfectionHumansIncidenceObservational Studies as TopicRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40503604
PMCPMC12159596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.