Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503587›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2025

Misspelled-Word Reading Modulates Late Cortical Dynamics.

Jiaxin You, Aino Saranpää, Tiina Lindh-Knuutila, Marijn van Vliet, Riitta Salmelin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiaxin YouDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0058-3288
Aino SaranpääDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.
Tiina Lindh-KnuutilaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.
Marijn van VlietDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6537-6899
Riitta SalmelinDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Aalto, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2499-193X

Funding

Academy of Finland 343385Academy of Finland 346585Academy of Finland 355407China Scholarship Council 202206100022Sigrid Juséliuksen Säätiö
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Literate humans can effortlessly interpret tens of thousands of words, even when the words are sometimes written incorrectly. This phenomenon suggests a flexible nature of reading that can endure a certain amount of noise. In this study, we investigated where and when brain responses diverged for conditions where misspelled words were resolved as real words or not. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to track the cortical activity as the participants read words with different degrees of misspelling that were perceived to range from real words to complete pseudowords, as confirmed by their behavioral responses. In particular, we were interested in how lexical information survives (or not) along the uncertainty spectrum, and how the corresponding brain activation patterns evolve spatiotemporally. We identified three brain regions that were notably modulated by misspellings: left ventral occipitotemporal cortex (vOT), superior temporal cortex (ST), and precentral cortex (pC). This suggests that resolving misspelled words into stored concepts involves an interplay between orthographic, semantic, and phonological processing. Temporally, these regions showed fairly late and sustained responses selectively to misspelled words. Specifically, an increasing level of misspelling increased the response in ST from 300 ms after stimulus onset; a functionally fairly similar but weaker effect was observed in pC. In vOT, misspelled words were sharply distinguished from real words, notably later, after 700 ms. A linear mixed effects (LME) analysis further showed that pronounced and long-lasting misspelling effects appeared first in ST and then in pC, with shorter-lasting activation also observed in vOT. We conclude that reading misspelled words engages brain areas typically associated with language processing, but in a manner that cannot be interpreted merely as a rapid feedforward mechanism. Instead, feedback interactions likely contribute to the late effects observed during misspelled-word reading.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexPattern Recognition, VisualReadingAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeSemanticsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40503587
PMCPMC12159769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.