Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503469›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology2025

The CANFOR Scale for the Assessment of Needs of Forensic Psychiatric Patients: Preliminary Report on the Polish Version of the Scale and Its Reliability.

Mikołaj Trizna, Anna Jeleń, Paweł Dębski, Joanna Smolarczyk, Magdalena Piegza, Andrzej Kiejna, Tomasz Adamowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry and clinical psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mikołaj TriznaCenter of Neuropsychiatry, Neuromed Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1969-1548
Anna JeleńLower Silesian Mental Health Centre, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5866-4545
Paweł DębskiDepartment of Psychology, Humanitas University, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5904-6407
Joanna SmolarczykDepartment of Psychiatry, Medical University of Silesia Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarnowskie Góry, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4297-8974
Magdalena PiegzaUniversity of Lower Silesia, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8009-7118
Andrzej KiejnaDivision of Nervous System Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3708-3853
Tomasz AdamowskiDivision of Nervous System Diseases, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2872-3644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The constantly growing number of patients in psychiatric wards (including forensic wards) is a serious social, medical, and economic problem. Therefore, it is necessary to study the needs of these patients. The aim of the study was to adapt and test the reliability of the Polish version of the scale for the assessment of needs of forensic psychiatric patients-Camberwell Assessment of Need-Forensic Version (CANFOR). Methods: The scale was translated into Polish and then back-translated. The study was conducted among 60 patients of basic and enhanced security level forensic psychiatry wards at the Provincial Specialist Mental Health Hospital in Poland. Results: When analyzing the reproducibility of the responses in terms of assessing the reliability of the CANFOR questionnaire, perfect agreement of 100% was obtained in 22 areas of need. Similarly, in the repeatability study of the CANFOR questionnaire after 2 weeks, perfect agreement-100%-was obtained in 24 areas of need. In the correlation analysis of the CANFOR with another measurement tool-LSP, significant values at the Conclusions: The study resulted in high reliability of the Polish version of the CANFOR scale. It is advisable to continue research in the area of psychometric properties of the scale, including the validity of the tool.

Identifiers

PMID40503469
PMCPMC12152421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.