ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Co-designing zoonotic diseases prevention practices when people depend on wild meat.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biocultural Ethnoecology ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Targeting Zoonotic Spillover Drivers for Global Pandemic Prevention: A Narrative Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Applying one health approaches to addressing disease risks in wildlife trade: Insights from a special issue.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Survival analysis of environmental determinants related to child mortality in Liberia.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Zoonotic disease knowledge attitude and practices among rural hunting communities in Gabon.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Commercial determinants of health: an approach for strengthening One Health interventions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the face of the escalating frequency of diseases emergences originating from wildlife, the development of reliable strategies for controlling zoonotic diseases transmission at the interface between wildlife and human is becoming a global priority. Rural communities whose subsistence is based on hunting for wild meat extraction are natural targets of such interventions, because of their regular contacts with wildlife. To date there have been few attempts at building preventive sanitary strategies taking into account the socioeconomic and institutional constraints in which wild meat systems operate. The study presented here, conducted in eastern Gabon, aimed at conceiving risk-reduction strategies of zoonotic diseases transmitted from wildlife in a two-phase approach, namely (1) an assessment phase, based on a survey on risk knowledge and practices conducted with members of communities living on wild meat, and (2) a co-design phase based on focus group discussions to identify acceptable prevention strategies aimed at limiting the contacts creating the major risks of exposure to zoonoses infections. The use of participatory methods aiming at eliciting issues and solutions from the participants, enabled the conception of strategies that were adapted to the context and well accepted by stakeholders at different stages, namely the track, capture, transport of wild animals, the butchering of carcasses, cooking and consumption process. However, some limitations to the effective application of the strategies can be anticipated notably because of (1) the current low and biased perception of zoonotic risks by wild meat actors, and (2) the economic incentives for maintaining risky behaviors like the capture and trade of live animals and the consumption or sale of animals found dead or displaying signs of disease infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.