Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503424›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2025

Standard Dose Versus Reduced Dose Single Fraction Preoperative Radiosurgery for Resected Brain Metastases (PROPS-BM) International Multicenter Cohort Study.

Roshan S Prabhu, Rachel Russek, Zachary K Vaslow, Jennifer K Matsui, Neda Haghighi, Tu Dan, Mark V Mishra, Erin S Murphy, Susan Boyles, Haley K Perlow and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. In Regard to Prabhu et al.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. In Reply to Marwaha, Shepard, and Wegner.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Roshan S PrabhuAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Rachel RussekAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Zachary K VaslowCone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Jennifer K MatsuiThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Neda HaghighiPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tu DanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Mark V MishraUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Erin S MurphyTaussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Susan BoylesCone Health Cancer Center, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Haley K PerlowThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Joshua D PalmerThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Cristian UdovicichPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Toral R PatelUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Zabi WardakUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Graeme F WoodworthUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alexander KsendzovskyUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kailin YangTaussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Samuel T ChaoTaussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Anthony L AsherAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Stuart H BurriAtrium Health Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Single fraction preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has historically used a 10% to 20% dose reduction standard dosing. However, the effects of this dose reduction are not well characterized. The goal of this study was to compare outcomes and toxicity of standard dose (SD) with reduced dose (RD) single fraction preoperative SRS. Methods and Materials: Patients with brain metastases from solid cancers, of which at least 1 lesion measuring ≤ 4 cm was treated with single fraction preoperative SRS and underwent planned resection were included from the Preoperative Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases (PROPS-BM international multicenter combined prospective and retrospective registries from 8 institutions. SD was a priori defined as ≥20 Gy for lesions ≤2 cm, ≥17 Gy for >2 to 3 cm, and ≥14 Gy for >3 to 4 cm based on institutional dosing practices. Multivariable and propensity score matched analyses were performed. Results: The cohort consisted of 307 patients with 307 preoperative SRS treated index lesions. SD was used in 124 patients (40%) and RD was used in 183 patients (60%). Median dose for lesions 0 to 2 cm (n = 73), >2 to 3 cm (n = 152), and >3 to 4 cm (n = 82) was 20, 18, and 15 Gy in the SD cohort and 16, 15, and 13 Gy in the RD cohort, respectively. There was no difference in 2-year cavity local recurrence (LR, 16% vs 15%, Conclusions: Both SD and RD single fraction preoperative SRS demonstrate excellent rates of cavity LR and ARE. Cavity LR risk increased with larger lesion size, regardless of SRS dose category. There does not seem to be an advantage in efficacy or toxicity for RD over SD single fraction preoperative SRS. Additional studies are warranted to optimize preoperative SRS dose and fractionation.

Identifiers

PMID40503424
PMCPMC12151215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.