ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
The effect of bivalent HPV vaccination against invasive cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3+) in the Netherlands: a population-based linkage study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of HPV vaccination on precancerous lesions and invasive cervical cancer in a low-vaccination-coverage setting in Germany: a retrospective cohort analysis.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- The Long-Term Effect of 2 and 3 Doses of Bivalent HPV Vaccination Against HPV Infections: A Comparison Between 2 Observational Cohort Studies.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Observational
- Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified screening for cervical cancer in cohorts vaccinated against human papillomavirus with moderate vaccination coverage.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Challenges and possible solutions towards reaching global cervical cancer elimination.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping strategies for management of HPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Cancer statistics, 2026: divergent trends and the implementation gap.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Extended follow-up of invasive cervical cancer risk after quadrivalent HPV vaccination: nationwide, register based study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Article
- HPV vaccination willingness and its determinants among male university students post-approval of male-specific HPV vaccines in China: a large-scale cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Expanding HPV prevention across the life course: evidence on vaccine effectiveness in adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Trends in the Incidence of Human Papillomavirus-Related Cancers in Canada and the Netherlands.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterObservational
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The protective effect of HPV vaccination against cervical cancer has been demonstrated in registry linkage studies. The start age of screening in those studies was lower than 25 years. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of bivalent HPV16/18 vaccination against invasive cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3+) in the Netherlands, where routine screening starts at age 30 years. Methods: We linked the vaccination status of women born in 1993 who were eligible for HPV vaccination at age 16 years with histopathological results recorded until April 1, 2024, in the nationwide pathology databank (Palga). Cumulative risks of invasive cervical cancer and CIN3+ were estimated for fully vaccinated (3 doses or 2 doses ≥150 days apart), partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated women. Cumulative risk ratios (CRRs) were adjusted for differences in screening participation between vaccine groups. Findings: A total of 103,059 women were included, of whom 47,130 were fully vaccinated, 5098 partially vaccinated, and 50,831 unvaccinated. Five cancers (0·011%) were observed in fully vaccinated, two (0·039%) in partially vaccinated, and 42 (0·083%) in unvaccinated women. The CRR for fully vaccinated women compared with unvaccinated women was 0·085 (95% confidence interval 0·025, 0·24) for cancer and 0·19 (0·16, 0·23) for CIN3+. The CRR for partially vaccinated women was 0·52 (0·12, 1·71) for cancer and 0·42 (0·30, 0·57) for CIN3+. Interpretation: The risk of cervical cancer and CIN3+ was strongly reduced in vaccinated women indicating that vaccine protection extends at least until age 30. Funding: The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.