Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503392›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

The effect of bivalent HPV vaccination against invasive cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3+) in the Netherlands: a population-based linkage study.

Marit Middeldorp, Jesca G M Brouwer, Janneke W Duijster, Mirjam J Knol, Folkert J van Kemenade, Albert G Siebers, Johannes Berkhof, Hester E de Melker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marit MiddeldorpCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Jesca G M BrouwerCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Janneke W DuijsterCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Mirjam J KnolCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Folkert J van KemenadeDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Albert G SiebersPalga (the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank), Houten, the Netherlands.
Johannes BerkhofDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Hester E de MelkerCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The protective effect of HPV vaccination against cervical cancer has been demonstrated in registry linkage studies. The start age of screening in those studies was lower than 25 years. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of bivalent HPV16/18 vaccination against invasive cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3+) in the Netherlands, where routine screening starts at age 30 years. Methods: We linked the vaccination status of women born in 1993 who were eligible for HPV vaccination at age 16 years with histopathological results recorded until April 1, 2024, in the nationwide pathology databank (Palga). Cumulative risks of invasive cervical cancer and CIN3+ were estimated for fully vaccinated (3 doses or 2 doses ≥150 days apart), partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated women. Cumulative risk ratios (CRRs) were adjusted for differences in screening participation between vaccine groups. Findings: A total of 103,059 women were included, of whom 47,130 were fully vaccinated, 5098 partially vaccinated, and 50,831 unvaccinated. Five cancers (0·011%) were observed in fully vaccinated, two (0·039%) in partially vaccinated, and 42 (0·083%) in unvaccinated women. The CRR for fully vaccinated women compared with unvaccinated women was 0·085 (95% confidence interval 0·025, 0·24) for cancer and 0·19 (0·16, 0·23) for CIN3+. The CRR for partially vaccinated women was 0·52 (0·12, 1·71) for cancer and 0·42 (0·30, 0·57) for CIN3+. Interpretation: The risk of cervical cancer and CIN3+ was strongly reduced in vaccinated women indicating that vaccine protection extends at least until age 30. Funding: The Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport.

Indexed as

Bivalent HPV vaccineCervical cancer screeningCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaEffectivenessHPV vaccination

Identifiers

PMID40503392
PMCPMC12153372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.