ArticleHealth science reports2025
A Hybrid VGG16-ViT Approach With Image Processing Techniques for Improved White Blood Cell Classification and Disease Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: White Blood Cells (WBCs) are essential for immune defense against infections. Automated WBC identification from microscopic images aids in diagnosing diseases like leukemia and AIDS. However, the complexity of WBC morphology due to varying maturation stages and staining techniques complicates classification. This study aims to enhance WBC detection and classification using a hybrid VGG16-Vision Transformer (VGG16-ViT) model. Methods: To enhance the efficiency of the classification process, preprocessing techniques such as data normalization, categorical variable encoding, feature extraction, and data augmentation were employed in conjunction with the proposed model before the training phase. The VGG16-ViT model was trained and evaluated on two datasets to measure its performance. Results: The overall success rate for classifying WBCs was 98.12% for Dataset 1% and 99.60% for Dataset 2. The measured average precision, recall, and F1-score values were 98.59%, 98.23%, and 98.35% for Dataset 1; similarly, 98.95%, 99.98%, and 99.48% for Dataset 2. The experimental results indicated that the classification success was strengthened when the proposed model was combined with specific preprocessing procedures, outperforming existing research. Conclusion: The hybrid VGG16-ViT model, combined with effective preprocessing techniques, significantly improved the detection and classification of WBCs. Additionally, the training approach of the proposed model is less time-consuming than existing transfer learning models, making it a valuable tool for assisting medical professionals in diagnosing diseases related to WBCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.