Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503338›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2025

An innovative cardiac rehabilitation based on the power-force-velocity profile to further improve cardiorespiratory capacities in coronary artery disease patients: CITIUS study.

Marie Fanget, Pierre Labeix, Jean-Benoit Morin, Manon Bayle, Jerome Koral, Rodolphe Testa, Nicolas Peyrot, Vincent Gremeaux, Marie-Christine Iliou, Thierry Busso and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marie FangetDepartment of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, University of Jean Monnet, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U 1059, Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez 42270, France.
Pierre LabeixDepartment of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, University of Jean Monnet, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U 1059, Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez 42270, France.
Jean-Benoit MorinInter-university Laboratory of Human Movement Biology, EA 7424, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez 42270, France.
Manon BayleDepartment of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, University of Jean Monnet, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U 1059, Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez 42270, France.
Jerome KoralInstitut National du Sport, de l'Expertise et de la Performance (INSEP), Paris 75012, France.
Rodolphe TestaClinique Universitaire du Sport et de l'Arthrose, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne 42270, France.
Nicolas PeyrotMovement-Interactions-Performance, MIP, EA 4334, Le Mans Université, Le Mans 72085, France.
Vincent GremeauxDepartment of Sports Medicine, Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne 1011, Switzerland.
Marie-Christine IliouCardiac Rehabilitation Department, Saint-Joseph Hospital, Paris 75014, France.
Thierry BussoInter-university Laboratory of Human Movement Biology, EA 7424, UJM-Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez 42270, France.
Jari Antero LaukkanenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio FI-70210, Finland.
Frederic RocheDepartment of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, University of Jean Monnet, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U 1059, Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez 42270, France.
David HupinDepartment of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, University of Jean Monnet, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Mines Saint-Etienne, INSERM, U 1059, Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez 42270, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Individually optimizing the training programme of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) remains a major concern among coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. The power-force-velocity profile (PFVP) for a given task is usually assessed to improve performance in athletes through individualized training. Therefore, assessing PFVP on stationary cycle ergometer may allow better personalization of CR programme. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a new CR customized based on patient's PFVP vs. a traditional CR in CAD patients on cardiorespiratory, biological, and muscular systems. Methods and results: A total of 86 patients participated in this study. The 3-week intervention consisted of physical training sessions (4/week) and therapeutic education workshops (1/week). Experimental group patients followed a specific cycle ergometer training programme focusing on their less developed PFVP quality. Control patients attended a conventional CR programme. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (VO Conclusion: The novel CR, based on initial individual PFVP performed on stationary cycle ergometer, showed greater benefits on cardiorespiratory capacities and lipid profile than a conventional, non-individualized CR. Therefore, PFVP could be used in CR to adapt specifically the content of training sessions.

Indexed as

Cardiac rehabilitationCoronary artery diseaseCycle sprintExercisePhysical activityPower–force–velocity relationship

Identifiers

PMID40503338
PMCPMC12152306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.