ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology
Subgroups of Steatotic Liver Disease Have Distinct Clinical Phenotypes.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The global burden of metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD).Hepatology communications · 2026Review
- Incidence of Cardiovascular Events and Extrahepatic Malignancies in Steatotic Liver Disease Subgroups.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Steatotic liver disease (SLD) describes a spectrum of liver disease caused by cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRF) and/or alcohol. We aimed to describe the effect of cumulative CMRF and alcohol in subgroups of SLD and compare clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients from a single centre with biopsy proven SLD were retrospectively included. Patients were classified according to consensus definitions into three subgroups of SLD. The risk of liver-related death or liver transplantation during follow-up was analysed considering competing risks. Outcomes were tabulated for ordinal groups of CMRF and alcohol intake. Results: 726 patients were included: 516 (71%) had metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), 85 (12%) MASLD with increased alcohol intake (MetALD), and 125 (17%) had ALD. Patients were followed up for a median of 60.5 months (IQR 29-84.5), during which time 64 (8.8%) patients died, including 23 liver-related deaths. Competing risk regression analysis showed that ALD was associated with higher risk of liver-related death sHR 8.47 (95% CI, 2.26-31.8, Conclusions: Amongst patients with SLD, patients with ALD have the greatest risk of adverse liver outcomes. Conversely, liver-related outcomes are less common in MASLD in the short to medium-term. This emphasises the need to identify and treat alcohol misuse as an important risk factor for adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.