ReviewThe Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research2024
[Strategies for the Endoscopic Management and Post-Resection Treatment of Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma].
Review in The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting the magnitude of risk for non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection in superficial esophageal cancer using explainable artificial intelligence.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic resection (ER) is preferred for treating superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) that has a low risk of lymph node metastasis; the preference is due to the technique's minimal invasiveness and having outcomes comparable to those of surgical resection, in suitable cases. Determining the appropriateness of ER requires a multidisciplinary review involving a pathological examination of the tumor's depth, size, and lymphovascular invasion following resection of a specimen. According to the Korean guidelines, no additional treatment is necessary after a complete en bloc resection of SESCC that lacks submucosal invasion and lymphovascular invasion. In cases of non-curative resection for tumors that exhibit submucosal invasion, lymphovascular invasion, or positive margins, additional treatment (e.g., esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy) is recommended. Due to the uncertainty regarding which treatment is more effective, tailored therapy that is based on patient factors and tumor characteristics is needed to maximize patient long-term survival and improve quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.