ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2025
Clinical challenges and outcomes of thoracoscopic
Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of expanded pediatric surgery add-on payments on claimed surgical fees: a multi-institutional data analysis.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
- Risk factors for anastomotic complications following thoracoscopic repair of type III esophageal atresia in neonates: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes between thoracoscopic surgery (TR) and open surgery (OR) for esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (EA with distal TEF) and to evaluate the feasibility of TR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 42 patients who underwent primary surgery for EA with distal TEF from January 2012 to December 2020. We compared the OR and TR groups based on patient characteristics, intraoperative outcomes, and early and late postoperative outcomes. Results: The TR group had longer operation times and a higher risk for intraoperative hypoxic events. Anastomosis leakage and stricture tended to occur more frequently in the TR group, although not statistically significant. The TR group required a significantly higher number of esophageal balloon dilatations (P = 0.006). Conclusion: Successful TR for EA with distal TEF requires advanced anesthesia and efforts to overcome the learning curve of surgical skill with limited thoracoscopic instruments for neonates. Despite challenges, TR is considered a feasible method for EA with distal TEF patients when performed by experienced pediatric surgeons with appropriate anesthesia support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.