Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503236›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Dupilumab treatment has no effect on the nasal microbiome in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease: a longitudinal pilot study.

Tina Bartosik, Petra Pjevac, Joana Séneca, Christina Morgenstern, Tamara Arnoldner, Katharina Gangl, Christoph Sinz, Nicholas James Campion, Aldine Tu, Victoria Stanek and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sinonasal microbiome remains stable during dupilumab therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis: a pilot study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Association betweenFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tina BartosikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Petra PjevacDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Joana SénecaDepartment of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christina MorgensternDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Tamara ArnoldnerDepartment of Dermatology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina GanglDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph SinzDepartment of Dermatology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nicholas James CampionDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Aldine TuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Victoria StanekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christine BangertDepartment of Dermatology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sven SchneiderDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia Eckl-DornaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, General Hospital and Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) affects up to 10% of patients suffering from nasal polyps and has a severe impact on quality of life. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor α chain, leads to symptom relief and reduction in nasal type 2 mediator levels. Here, we investigated the impact of dupilumab treatment on the composition and diversity of the nasal microbiome. Methodology: Nasal microbiome was analyzed by 16s rRNA gene amplicon sequencing in 28 patients before, 4, 12, and 24 weeks after dupilumab therapy. Results: After stringent decontamination and removal of patients whose samples contained less than 500 reads at ≥ one of the four visits, full datasets from 8 out of 28 patients remained for downstream analysis of microbiome data. All 8 patients showed significant reduction in TPS (total polyp score; p=0.0078) and an improvement in SNOT-22 (Sino-nasal outcome test-22, a quality of life questionnaire; p=0.0781) after dupilumab therapy. During 24 weeks of dupilumab therapy, there were no major changes in microbiome diversity or composition observed (Shannon index: V1-V4:p-adj=0.25, Chao 1 Index V1-V4:p-adj=0.31), and only 2 out of 8 patients showed a decrease in staphylococci abundance. Conclusions: More than 70% of the samples did not pass quality control, this warrants further refinement of nasal microbiome sampling techniques and mandatory guidelines on stringent quality control for analysis of this low biomass data in future. Furthermore, dupilumab did not have an impact on microbiome diversity or composition.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalMicrobiotaAdultAgedFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNasal PolypsPilot ProjectsQuality of LifeRNA, Ribosomal, 16STreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidaldupilumabRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCRSwNPdupilumabmicrobiomeN-ERDStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID40503236
PMCPMC12151831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.