ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Efficiency of cell-based assays in detecting AChR antibodies in myasthenia gravis sera with low antibody concentrations as determined by radioimmunoprecipitation assay.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive review on myasthenia gravis: patho-physiology, diagnosis, management strategies.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026Review
- Enhanced antibody detection via live cell-based assay among RIA negative myasthenia gravis patients: toward improved diagnosis and clinical correlates.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Italian recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of myasthenia gravis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Application analysis of transfected cell method for detecting AChR antibodies in MG patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Improving sensitivity of autoantibody testing for myasthenia gravis using cell-based assays: an evaluation of strategies that may be used in clinical practice.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We investigated whether the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) cluster cell-based assay (CBA) is effective in detecting AChR antibodies in sera from myasthenia gravis (MG) patients with low antibody concentrations, as determined by radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA). Methods: In this retrospective diagnostic cohort study, 193 RIPA-positive sera from MG patients were analyzed. Following initial assessment using the gold-standard RIPA, samples were tested with a commercially available fixed CBA (F-CBA) and an in-house live CBA (L-CBA) to detect clustered AChR antibodies. Patients were classified into three groups based on RIPA levels to evaluate the sensitivity of each CBA. A subset of the cohort was blindly retested in a second laboratory to confirm results. Results: The sensitivity of L-CBA and F-CBA in detecting 36 sera with low AChR-antibody levels (1.0-2.8 nM) was relatively high for L-CBA (83.33%, 95% CI: 71.16%, 95.51%) and low for F-CBA (45.71%, 95% CI: 29.21% to 62.22%). Both CBAs were 100% sensitive for sera with AChR-RIPA values > 3 nM. Antibodies of RIPA+/CBA- sera could be immunoadsorbed on AChR-transfected cells equally well as those from RIPA+/CBA+ sera, indicating that CBA negativity was due to low antibody concentrations. Discussion: Overall, while AChR L-CBA demonstrates good sensitivity for detecting low concentrations of AChR antibodies, F-CBA performs less reliably in such cases. Since clustered AChR-CBAs can also identify antibodies that are not detectable by RIPA, we recommend that both RIPA and CBA be used together in the routine diagnosis of MG whenever possible. When available, L-CBA should be preferred over F-CBA due to its higher sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.