ReviewSpine surgery and related research2025
The Clinical Impact of Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation on Pedicle Screw Placement and its Effect on Perioperative Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Review in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal fusion is a common form of orthopedic surgery, the most common of which involves pedicle screw placement (PSP). Despite well-documented benefits, pedicle screws are associated with several intraoperative complications. This area of surgery has subsequently been recipient to many surgical developments. Currently, augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) is at the forefront of surgical interest. This systematic review evaluates whether, when compared to freehand, fluoroscopic, and intraoperative image-guided navigation, ARSN results in superior screw accuracy and operative outcomes for patients undergoing PSP surgery. Methods: Data collection was performed on PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and the Web of Science between January 7, 2023, and January 8, 2024. PRISMA guidelines were followed and the level of evidence was graded per the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine's recommendations. Risk of bias was assessed per the ROBINS-I tool and the Cochrane guide for assessing study quality. A modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to determine the certainty of the body of evidence. Results: A total of 521 papers were obtained from all bibliographical databases, 31 of which were included in the final review. ARSN resulted in a significantly greater number of screws placed as Gertzbein and Robbins grade 1 or 2 (93.33% vs 85.86%, p<0.000), significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss (470.32 vs 802.44 ml, p=0.050), comparative operative duration (281.6 vs 255.5 min, p=0.819), comparative time to place a screw (2.71 vs 3.1 min, p=0.703), and a nonsignificant reduction in hospital stay (5.4 vs 7.5 days, p=0.097). Maximum follow-up was more than 14 days. Conclusions: ARSN results in a significantly greater number of screws placed at Gertzbein-Robertson grade 1 or 2 than non-ARSN surgery. Therefore, ARSN can be considered as a safe and efficacious technical innovation within PSP surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.