Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503201›Full record

ArticleSpine surgery and related research2025

Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Intradiscal Injection of Condoliase for a Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Severe Low Back Pain: A Multicenter Study.

Takashi Hirai, Takuya Takahashi, Yohei Takahashi, Kota Watanabe, Tomohiro Banno, Kyohei Sakaki, Yoshiyasu Arai, Yuichi Takano, Yawara Eguchi, Yuki Taniguchi and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Takashi HiraiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuya TakahashiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yohei TakahashiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kota WatanabeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro BannoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu Univerisity School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Kyohei SakakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Japan.
Yoshiyasu AraiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Japan.
Yuichi TakanoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inanami Spine and Joint Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yawara EguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Joto Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki TaniguchiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoshi MakiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yasuchika AokiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Japan.
Shunichi FujiiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro SakaedaDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yu MatsukuraDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tsutomu AkazawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Akihito MinamideDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Nikko Medical Center, Nikko, Japan.
Hidetoshi NojiriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichiro SakaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Japan.
Satoshi KatoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Koji TamaiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Hidekazu SuzukiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki MiyagiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Sagamihara, Japan.
Hiroyuki SatoDepartment of Clinical Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshitaka YoshiiDepartment of Orthopedics, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi YamadaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Takashi KaitoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan.
Yutaka HiraizumiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masatsune YamagataDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oyuminochuobyoin Mobara Clinic, Mobara, Japan.
Masaya NakamuraDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Akihiro HirakawaDepartment of Clinical Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Naofumi HosoganeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan.
Seiji OhtoriDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chemonucleolysis with condoliase (chondroitin sulfate ABC endolyase) has been widely employed to treat patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in Japan. Although it is an effective and relatively safe treatment for radicular neuropathy in patients with LDH, there have been no reports that investigate how severe low back pain (LBP) changes after condoliase injection. In this multicenter study, the effectiveness of condoliase injection for reducing severe LBP in patients with LDH was evaluated. Methods: This retrospective study involved patients treated with intradiscal condoliase injection for LDH at nine participating centers. Patients were diagnosed with subligamentous-type herniation based on pretreatment MRI. Patients with severe LBP (defined as a preinjection numeric rating scale [NRS] for LBP greater than or equal to that for leg pain) were categorized into the LBP group. Demographic data, adverse events, treatment costs, and the NRS for LBP and lower extremity pain were analyzed. A 50% response was defined as ≥50% improvement in the NRS at 1 year postinjection. On the basis of the Pfirman classification, the LBP group was divided into less-degenerative (Grades II and III) and degenerative (Grades IV and V) subgroups. Results: Seventy-nine patients were classified into the LBP group. Of these patients, 61 (77.2%) showed a >50% reduction in LBP, and another 61 (77.2%) demonstrated a >50% reduction in lower extremity pain. Improvement of lower limb pain was considerably better in the less-degenerative group than in the degenerative group, whereas that of low back pain was similar between the two subgroups. Medical costs, which include remuneration for injection, drug fees, inpatient costs, and other expenses, were similar between the LBP group and all cases. Conclusions: This retrospective multicenter study revealed that patients with LDH with severe LBP frequently experienced improvement in radicular pain and LBP, which is similar to LDH cases without severe LBP.

Indexed as

chemonucleolysiscondoliaseIntradiscal injectionleg painlow back painlumbar intervertebral disc herniationmedical costradiculopathy

Identifiers

PMID40503201
PMCPMC12151286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.