ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2025
The anterior intercrest line is a novel, accurate surface marking for identifying the L4/5 disc level: a prospective agreement study with fluoroscopy.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There have been no previous reports of reliable surface landmarks for determining the optimal incision site for anterior lumbar spine access without fluoroscopy. We aimed to assess the accuracy of the anterior intercrest line for predicting the surface projection of the L4/5 disc level, compared with the fluoroscopically determined level. Methods: Prospective agreement study of consecutive patients without transitional anatomy undergoing anterior exposure for either interbody fusion or total disc replacement surgery at L4/5. The primary outcome measure was the distance from the symphysis pubis to the skin markings for the L4/5 level, as determined by the intercrest line method or fluoroscopic method. The anterior intercrest line was determined by placing a silk tie between the bilateral iliac crests palpated in the mid-axillary line. The skin was marked in the anterior midline along this line. The surface projection of the L4/5 disc was determined using lateral fluoroscopy and marked in the anterior midline. The distance between the upper palpable margin of the symphysis pubis and each L4/5 skin mark was measured. The marking modality difference (MMD) was the difference in distance between the 2 methods. Results: Of 81 patients (49 males, 32 females) the MMD was 0.36 ± 1.19 cm. The intraclass correlation coefficient between distances determined by the 2 methods was 0.84, demonstrating high agreement between the techniques. Single predictor and multiple linear regression analyses revealed no significant associations between MMD and age, sex, BMI, or operative position. Conclusion: There was high agreement between the anterior intercrest line method and fluoroscopy for determining the surface projection of the L4/5 disc. The anterior intercrest line is a simple, clinically accurate, and reliable tool for planning the location of the skin incision for anterior exposure of the L4/5 disc level. Using this line would reduce radiation exposure, overall operative times, and costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.