Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503094›Full record

ArticleResearch in diagnostic and interventional imaging2025

Hydrodissection in microwave ablation: the effectiveness of 0.9 % NaCl versus 5 % dextrose in an ex vivo experimental set-up.

Gonnie C M van Erp, Pim Hendriks, Sophie A van den Hurk, Hannah F Winder, Willemijn P M Scholtes, Lara B E M De Bats, Jouke Dijkstra, Mark C Burgmans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gonnie C M van ErpInterventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Albinsudreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Pim HendriksInterventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Albinsudreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Sophie A van den HurkInterventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Albinsudreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Hannah F WinderInterventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Albinsudreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Willemijn P M ScholtesInterventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Albinsudreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Lara B E M De BatsInterventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Albinsudreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Jouke DijkstraInterventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Albinsudreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.
Mark C BurgmansInterventional Radiology Research (IR2) Group, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC, Albinsudreef 2, Leiden 2333 ZA, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of hydrodissection using 0.9 % NaCl (saline) or 5 % dextrose in water during microwave ablation at different hydrodissection fluid thicknesses, in an ex vivo experimental set-up. Methods: Two porcine liver parts were placed in a plastic container simulating a superficial liver ablation with adjacent tissue. The space between the livers was filled with either saline or 5 % dextrose in water. Microwave ablation was performed 4 min at 100 W, at 15 mm from the liver surface. Three thermocouples were used to determine the heat propagation: (1) between the microwave ablation antenna and liver surface; (2) 5 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue; (3) 15 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue. Forty experiments were performed using hydrodissection fluid thicknesses ranging from 1 to 10 mm. The maximum temperature increase for each thermocouple was determined. A Spearman's correlation analysis assessed the relationship between the hydrodissection fluid thickness (in millimeters) and the temperature increase (in degrees Celsius) per fluid. Results: At 5 mm within the adjacent tissue, use of 1 mm hydrodissection fluid thickness with 5 % dextrose in water resulted in less temperature increase (4.6 °C) compared to saline (6.8 °C). Additionally, at this distance, a negative correlation was observed between hydrodissection fluid thickness and temperature increase for both saline hydrodissection ( Conclusion: Results from this experimental ex vivo study suggest that 5 % dextrose in water may protect adjacent critical structures better from heating during microwave ablation than saline.

Indexed as

0.9 % NaClD5WHydrodissectionMicrowave ablationThermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID40503094
PMCPMC12148655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.