ArticleResearch in diagnostic and interventional imaging2025
Hydrodissection in microwave ablation: the effectiveness of 0.9 % NaCl versus 5 % dextrose in an ex vivo experimental set-up.
Article in Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Thermal ablation for primary hyperparathyroidism-long-term follow-up results.European radiology · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Thermal ablation for primary hyperparathyroidism-long-term follow-up results.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of hydrodissection using 0.9 % NaCl (saline) or 5 % dextrose in water during microwave ablation at different hydrodissection fluid thicknesses, in an ex vivo experimental set-up. Methods: Two porcine liver parts were placed in a plastic container simulating a superficial liver ablation with adjacent tissue. The space between the livers was filled with either saline or 5 % dextrose in water. Microwave ablation was performed 4 min at 100 W, at 15 mm from the liver surface. Three thermocouples were used to determine the heat propagation: (1) between the microwave ablation antenna and liver surface; (2) 5 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue; (3) 15 mm from the surface of the adjacent tissue. Forty experiments were performed using hydrodissection fluid thicknesses ranging from 1 to 10 mm. The maximum temperature increase for each thermocouple was determined. A Spearman's correlation analysis assessed the relationship between the hydrodissection fluid thickness (in millimeters) and the temperature increase (in degrees Celsius) per fluid. Results: At 5 mm within the adjacent tissue, use of 1 mm hydrodissection fluid thickness with 5 % dextrose in water resulted in less temperature increase (4.6 °C) compared to saline (6.8 °C). Additionally, at this distance, a negative correlation was observed between hydrodissection fluid thickness and temperature increase for both saline hydrodissection ( Conclusion: Results from this experimental ex vivo study suggest that 5 % dextrose in water may protect adjacent critical structures better from heating during microwave ablation than saline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.