Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503093›Full record

ArticleResearch in diagnostic and interventional imaging2025

In vivo percutaneous microwave ablation with ECO system in swine kidney and liver: comparison of ablation-zone size to manufacturer predictions and assessment of new antenna design.

Théo Bonnefoy, Georges Tarris, Kévin Guillen, Olivia Poupardin, Olivier Chevallier, Ludwig Serge Aho Glele, Jean-Michel Correas, Romaric Loffroy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Théo BonnefoyDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, centre hospitalier universitaire François-Mitterrand, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, BP 77908, 21000 Dijon, France.
Georges TarrisDepartment of Pathology, centre hospitalier universitaire François-Mitterrand, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, BP, 77908, 21000 Dijon, France.
Kévin GuillenDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, centre hospitalier universitaire François-Mitterrand, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, BP 77908, 21000 Dijon, France.
Olivia PoupardinBiossan Advancing Biomedical and Experimental Research, pôle agricole Auxois Sud, 21320 Créancey, France.
Olivier ChevallierDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, centre hospitalier universitaire François-Mitterrand, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, BP 77908, 21000 Dijon, France.
Ludwig Serge Aho GleleDepartment of Epidemiology, Statistics and Clinical Research, centre hospitalier universitaire François-Mitterrand, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, BP 77908, 21000 Dijon, France.
Jean-Michel CorreasDepartment of Adult Radiology, hôpital Necker-Enfants-malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France.
Romaric LoffroyDepartment of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Image-Guided Therapy Center, centre hospitalier universitaire François-Mitterrand, 14, rue Paul-Gaffarel, BP 77908, 21000 Dijon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Percutaneous microwave ablation is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for small tumors. To achieve local disease control, the entire tumor and a surrounding safety margin must be destroyed. Power and application time are chosen based on manufacturer-provided data, usually obtained from ex vivo animal models. However, ex vivo tissues differ from in vivo condition due to compositional changes and absence of heat dissipation by blood flow. This study aimed to compare in vivo ablation zone sizes in swine with those predicted by the device manufacturer. Methods: Five pigs underwent 40 microwave ablation procedures using various power-time-organ combinations; 18 hepatic and 20 renal zones were evaluable. All procedures were performed with devices from a single manufacturer (ECO Microwave System Co, Nanjing, China). After euthanasia, the ablation zones were excised and sliced. For each ablation, the slice showing the largest dimensions was selected to measure x and y diameters and used to compute the ablated surface area. Results: For seven of eight power-time-organ combinations, significant differences were found between predicted and measured surface areas ( Conclusion: Manufacturer-provided predictive data for microwave ablation zone size may lack reliability. Intraoperative and postoperative monitoring of ablation zone size is crucial to ensure complete tumor destruction with adequate margins.

Indexed as

Interventional radiologyIn vivo animal modelMicrowave ablationPercutaneous

Identifiers

PMID40503093
PMCPMC12158524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.