Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40503017›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Diffusion Transformer-based Universal Dose Denoising for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Yuzhen Ding, Jason Holmes, Hongying Feng, Martin Bues, Lisa A McGee, Jean-Claude M Rwigema, Nathan Y Yu, Terence S Sio, Sameer R Keole, William W Wong and 6 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yuzhen DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Jason HolmesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Hongying FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Martin BuesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Lisa A McGeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Jean-Claude M RwigemaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Nathan Y YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Terence S SioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Sameer R KeoleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
William W WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Steven E SchildDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Jonathan B AshmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Sujay A VoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Daniel J MaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Samir H PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Wei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

Funding

Dose Linear Energy Transfer Volume Histogram and Dosimetric Seed Spot Analysis in Spot Scanning Proton TherapyR01CA280134 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Wei Liu · 2024 to 2026
$1.7M
Online Adaptive Proton TherapyR01EB293388 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Wei Liu · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA280134NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB293388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is an advanced treatment modality for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients, offering precise tumor dose coverage while sparing surrounding organs at risk (OARs). However, IMPT is highly sensitive to inter-fractional anatomical changes, necessitating periodic adjustments through online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). But a significant bottleneck in the current oART workflow is the need for fast and accurate dose calculation using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations for plan quality assessment and re-optimization. Reducing the number of particles in MC-based simulations can accelerate dose calculation but at the cost of reduced accuracy. To address this, denoising noisy dose maps generated by low statistics MC simulations has been proposed as a method to rapidly and accurately generate high-accuracy dose maps. Methods: A diffusion transformer-based dose denoising framework was developed. IMPT treatment plans and 3D CT images from 80 H&N cancer patients were used to construct the training dataset by generating noisy dose maps and their corresponding high statistics dose maps using an open-source MC software, MCsquare, with a computation time of approximately 1 minutes and 10 minutes per plan, respectively. Each data sample was standardized into uniform chunks with zero-padding. Then, normalization and non-linear mapping were applied to the data samples to transform them toward a quasi-Gaussian distribution. The treatment plans and 3D CT images from another independent 10 H&N cancer patients, 10 prostate cancer patients, 10 lung cancer patients, and 10 breast cancer patients were used as the testing dataset, following the same preprocessing protocol as the training dataset. The proposed model was trained with noisy dose maps and 3D CT images as input and high statistics dose maps as the ground truth. The training was constrained by mean square error (MSE) loss, a residual loss that focused on reducing the difference between the predicted and ground truth dose maps and a regional mean absolute error (MAE) loss that specifically targeted voxels with the top 10% and bottom 10% dose values. Performance was evaluated using MAE. 3D Gamma passing rates and dose volume histogram (DVH) indices were calculated to assess differences between the predicted and ground-truth dose maps. Results: The proposed framework achieved MAE of 0.195 ± 0.112 Gy[RBE], 0.120 ± .054 Gy[RBE], 0 . 172 ± .096 Gy[RBE], and 0.376 ± 0.375 Gy[RBE] for H&N, lung, breast and prostate testing cases, respectively. The 3D gamma passing rate consistently exceeded 92% in the whole body using a 3%/2 mm criterion across all disease sites. DVH indices calculated from the ground truth and predicted dose distributions showed excellent agreement for both clinical target volumes (CTVs) and OARs. Conclusion: A diffusion transformer-based denoising framework was successfully developed. Although the denoising model was trained using only H&N data, it can accurately and robustly denoise noisy dose maps across different disease sites.

Identifiers

PMID40503017
PMCPMC12155049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.