ReviewACS catalysis2025
AI Approaches to Homogeneous Catalysis with Transition Metal Complexes.
Review in ACS catalysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanism-Guided, Data-Driven Discovery of a Dinuclear Gold Catalyst for Promoting Oxidative Addition.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- The Future of Foundation Machine Learning Potentials and DFT in Homogeneous Catalysis: Competition or Synergy?Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Benchmarking molecular representations and machine learning algorithms for asymmetric catalysis: a palladium-catalysed decarboxylative asymmetric allylic alkylation case study.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- 3DOpt: Benchmark for Automated Design of 3D Molecular Structures across the Periodic Table.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Boosting Computational Catalysis and Chemical Reactivity with Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Homogeneous Catalysis: Basic Concepts and Best Practices.ACS catalysis · 2026Article
- Bridging heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysis in carbon dioxide valorization.Npj materials sustainability · 2026Review
- tmQMg* Data Set: Excited State Properties of 74k Transition Metal Complexes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Reaction-conditioned generative model for catalyst design and optimization with CatDRX.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming research in chemistry, including homogeneous catalysis with transition metals. Over the past 15 years, the number of publications combining AI with catalysis has increased exponentially, reflecting the interest and strength of this strategy in the field. Since this is a broad emerging discipline, it is essential to establish guidelines that clarify the diverse approaches already available. The complexity of the tasks that can be carried out with AI tools is directly linked to the nature of their components, including datasets, representations, algorithms, and high-throughput experimental and computational facilities. In parallel to the evolution of these tools, applications to catalysis have also advanced. Initially, models were developed to predict key aspects of the reaction mechanism, aiming at screening catalyst candidates. Subsequent studies have incorporated experimental data to optimize reaction conditions and yields. More recently, generative AI based on deep learning methods has enabled the inverse design of novel catalysts with predefined target properties. While most studies rely on computational data, recent advancements have improved the acquisition of experimental data, enabling AI-driven automated workflows. This Perspective gives a critical overview on selected studies that reflect the state of the art in the application of AI to homogeneous metal-catalyzed reactions, also highlighting future opportunities and challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.