ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
Investigating the Success Rate of Vaginal Delivery After Cesarean Section and Its Associated Factors in Afghan Women: Insights from a Maternity Hospital in Kabul.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the Success Rate of Vaginal Delivery After Cesarean Section and Its Associated Factors in Afghan Women: Insights from a Maternity Hospital in Kabul [Response to Letter].International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Critique on "Investigating the Success Rate of Vaginal Delivery After Cesarean Section and Its Associated Factors in Afghan Women: Insights from a Maternity Hospital in Kabul" [Letter].International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean delivery (VBAC) is widely regarded as one of the most effective methods to reduce unnecessary Cesarean section and their complications. Despite its proven benefits, data on the success rate of VBAC and the associated factors remain scarce in Afghanistan. This study aimed to address this gap by determining the VBAC success rate and identifying its associated factors in a maternity hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Malalai Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital in Kabul, Afghanistan. The study sample included women with a history of previous cesarean section who visited the hospital between March 21 and September 22, 2023. Demographic and clinical information were collected from client files. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the demographic and clinical characteristics of the study sample. The association between VBAC and various categorical variables were examined using chi-square tests, with a significance level set at Results: Among the 567 women included in the study, 449 (79.2%) had a successful VBAC. Factors associated with successful VBAC and their adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) were lower gestational age: 1.25 (1.05-1.48), absence of gestational hypertension: 2.71 (1.26-5.85), cervical dilation of > 4 cm on admission: 2.77 (1.38-5.55), effacement of ≥ 50% on admission: 2.13 (1.04-4.35), and absence of fetal distress: 7.35 (4.29-12.6). Conclusion: The rate of successful VBAC observed in this study is at a high level (79.2%). This study is the first study to determine the VBAC success rate and its associated factors in Afghanistan. Further research is needed to validate these findings and explore additional factors influencing VBAC success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.