Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40502926›Full record

ArticleScience in One Health2025

Regulating antimicrobial resistance in the environment: analysis of Thailand legal framework and areas for reinforcement.

Angkana Lekagul, Saowapa Khotchalai, Wanwisa Kaewkhankhaeng, Mary Gordoncillo, Fuangfa Utrarachkij, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science in One Health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angkana LekagulInternational Health Policy Programme Foundation, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Saowapa KhotchalaiInternational Health Policy Programme Foundation, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Wanwisa KaewkhankhaengInternational Health Policy Programme Foundation, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Mary GordoncilloFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok 10200, Thailand.
Fuangfa UtrarachkijDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Viroj TangcharoensathienInternational Health Policy Programme Foundation, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global health issue, exacerbated by extensive antimicrobial use across human, animal, and plant sectors. The environment plays a crucial role in AMR emergence and spread due to the contamination from resistant bacteria, resistance genes, and antimicrobial residues from various sources. In Thailand, the regulatory framework that can reinforce AMR mitigation in environmental settings remains underdeveloped. This study aims to analyse the existing regulatory framework for environmental AMR control by identifying regulatory gaps and assessing the challenges of implementing these regulations. Methods: A qualitative approach was employed, combining a literature review and semi-structured interviews with 28 key informants from diverse regulatory sectors, including the ministries of health, agriculture, and environment. This included multi-level stakeholders at national, provincial, and local levels, as well as selected farmers. Content analysis of interview transcripts and regulatory documents was performed to triangulate findings on regulatory gaps and implementation barriers. Results: The study identified five regulatory categories governing water contamination across settings: rivers/canals, hospital wastewater, household wastewater, industrial waste (including pharmaceuticals), and animal farms. While the regulatory frameworks guide pollution standards, regulations lack provisions specific to AMR, highlighting a significant gap in AMR oversight and data on AMR pathogens in environmental wastewater. Key barriers include insufficient incorporation of AMR indicators in routine monitoring, limited enforcement, and inadequate technical and budgetary support. Conclusion: Thailand's current environmental AMR framework lacks comprehensive AMR-specific regulations and robust enforcement mechanisms. Addressing these gaps requires multi-sectoral coordination, enhanced funding, and capacity-building initiatives. By prioritizing indicator development and establishing AMR-focused policies, Thailand can enhance its environmental AMR control measures and contribute to global AMR mitigation efforts.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceEnvironmentLegal frameworkRegulationThailand

Identifiers

PMID40502926
PMCPMC12152667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.