ArticleCureus2025
Assessing Osteopathic Medical Students' Knowledge, Attitude, and Perspective on the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART).
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community awareness of assisted reproductive technologies in Jordan: educational gaps and knowledge levels.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical students face unique challenges in balancing training and family planning, often delaying childbearing due to the rigorous demands of the medical curriculum. In general, female physicians have their first childbirth at an age higher than that of women in the general population, increasing their risk of fertility challenges. Despite awareness of these challenges, medical students often prioritize professional commitments hoping to rely on assisted reproductive technologies (ART) later. However, ART's success rates decline with age, and its success in older women often depends on the use of eggs harvested early and stored. A comprehensive understanding of ART will help medical students make informed decisions on childbearing. This study evaluated medical students' knowledge of ART and assessed their attitudes toward its use.
methodsThis study employed a survey research design to evaluate medical students' knowledge, awareness, and attitude toward ART. The custom-designed instrument was developed based on a review of relevant literature, informal interviews, and expert consultations and adapted from an earlier survey tool. The final questionnaire included three sections: nine demographic items, 15 knowledge items assessing understanding of various topics related to fertility and ART, and 17 attitude items evaluating views on various issues pertaining to ART. The survey also included open-ended text boxes for qualitative responses. Data were collected using an electronic survey administered through Qualtrics (Qualtrics International Inc., Seattle, WA, US) over eight weeks. Collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 30 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). Descriptive statistics summarized demographic characteristics, knowledge, and attitudes. Independent t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-squared statistics assessed differences across demographic categories. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses identified emerging themes.
resultsThe study involved 113 medical students. The majority were first-year female students aged 25 years and older. Most participants (n = 106, 93%) did not have children but planned to have children in the future, particularly after residency. While participants demonstrated strong knowledge of ART, especially regarding the impact of age on fertility, most had an average understanding of birth control effects and the male partner's age on pregnancy outcomes. Knowledge about financial aspects, health risks, and long-term outcomes of ART-conceived children was comparatively lower. Attitudes toward ART were generally favorable, with strong support for egg and sperm donation and moderate interest in egg harvesting and freezing. There was considerable support for making in vitro fertilization (IVF) available to single women and same-sex couples, but a preference for limited federal funding for IVF and a moderate willingness to pay for it. In general, participants opposed the use of surrogate mothers by couples capable of carrying pregnancies and had divided views on the designation of frozen embryos as "children."
conclusionsOverall, this study revealed limited knowledge about ART among medical students, particularly regarding the financial and long-term implications of using ART. These results highlight the need for earlier integration of fertility and ART education into medical school curricula, which would better prepare students to make informed reproductive decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.