ArticleCureus2025
Patient Satisfaction With Single-Shot Spinal Analgesia for Labor: A Single-Center Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background In low- and middle-income countries, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the availability of epidural analgesia for labor has been limited due to a shortage of anesthesiologists. As an alternative, single-shot spinal analgesia can offer effective pain relief during childbirth. Objective The objective of the study is to evaluate patient satisfaction with single-shot spinal analgesia provided during labor. Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the General Hospital Sarajevo over a two-year period. Fifty parturients received single-shot spinal analgesia during the active phase of labor (cervical dilatation ≥ 5 cm). The analgesic mixture included 0.5% levobupivacaine (0.5 mL), fentanyl (25 mcg), and 0.9% NaCl (1 mL). Pain intensity was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before the procedure, 10 minutes afterward, one hour after administration, and during delivery. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Results The average duration of labor pain prior to the procedure was four hours. Mean VAS scores were 9 before the procedure, 3 after 10 minutes, 1 after one hour, and 4 during delivery. Spinal analgesia lasted approximately 110 minutes. During this period, 66% of parturients delivered, while in 34%, the effect of analgesia ended before delivery. All patients expressed satisfaction with the analgesia received. Conclusion Single-shot spinal analgesia provided effective pain relief and high patient satisfaction, even among those who did not deliver during the period of analgesic effect. It offered parturients sufficient time to rest and actively participate in the final stage of labor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.