ArticleCureus2025
Diagnosis of Perforated Appendiceal Diverticulitis Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Appendiceal diverticulitis is a rare and often underdiagnosed condition that poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its atypical clinical presentation and similarity to acute appendicitis. We describe the case of a 37-year-old female patient who presented with acute abdominal pain and was ultimately diagnosed with appendicitis through computed tomography (CT). The patient underwent a successful laparoscopic appendectomy. This case underscores the diagnostic complexity of appendiceal diverticulitis, which is frequently mistaken for other causes of acute abdomen. The condition may be congenital or acquired, with differing pathophysiological mechanisms and histological features. Given the risk of complications such as perforation or neoplasia, prophylactic appendectomy is recommended even in cases of non-inflamed diverticula. Histopathological examination remains essential for definitive diagnosis. This case highlights the importance of heightened clinical suspicion and individualized surgical management in improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.