Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40502858›Full record

ArticleOpen respiratory archives

Expert Consensus on Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for the Treatment of Asthma in Adult Patients.

Carolina Cisneros Serrano, Eva Martínez Moragón, Alicia Padilla-Galo, Cleofé Fernández Aracil, Andrea Trisán Alonso, Gerardo Pérez Chica, Ana Pueyo Bastida, Auxiliadora Romero Falcón, José Ángel Carretero-Gracia, José Gregorio Soto-Campos and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carolina Cisneros SerranoHospital Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Eva Martínez MoragónHospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
Alicia Padilla-GaloHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Cleofé Fernández AracilHospital General Universitario Doctor Balmis, Alicante, Spain.
Andrea Trisán AlonsoHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Gerardo Pérez ChicaHospital Universitario de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Ana Pueyo BastidaHospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Auxiliadora Romero FalcónHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.
José Ángel Carretero-GraciaHospital Universitario Royo Villanova, Zaragoza, Spain.
José Gregorio Soto-CamposHospital Universitario de Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Spain.
Members of the Validation Task Force

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite existing guidelines, many patients with asthma do not achieve adequate control of their disease. This is largely due to low adherence to inhaled therapy. Single-inhaler administration may improve this and other aspects of asthma therapy, such as cost-effectiveness. The aim of this study is to gather the opinions of a panel of experts on single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT) for the treatment of asthma in adult patients. Material and methods: A recommendation task force reviewed the available evidence and formulated 45 statements divided into 5 sections: efficacy, cost-effectiveness, therapeutic adherence, safety, and patient satisfaction. A validation task force of 71 experts evaluated these recommendations using the 2-round Delphi technique. Panellists rated their agreement with each statement on a 9-point scale. Results: Consensus was achieved in 42 of the 45 statements. Panellists broadly agreed that SITT improves lung function, reduces exacerbations, is cost-effective, and promotes therapeutic adherence. The safety of TT was considered favourable, even in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. The panellists also agreed on the importance of evaluating patient satisfaction with the inhaler. However, no consensus was reached regarding the suitability of TT as a first-line treatment, nor on whether TT is more beneficial than up-dosing ICS in patients with a low inflammatory profile currently receiving dual therapy. Additionally, panellists did not agree on whether sick leave due to respiratory causes was associated with greater adherence to TT. Conclusions: The consensus indicates that SITT is considered an effective, safe option for the treatment of asthma that improves therapeutic adherence and patient satisfaction. Further real-world studies are needed to evaluate its implementation in different clinical contexts.

Indexed as

AdherenceAsthmaConsensusCost-effectivenessDelphiDeviceEfficacySafetySatisfactionSingle inhalerTriple therapy

Identifiers

PMID40502858
PMCPMC12158490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.