ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2025
A GORTEC survey on low-risk CTV-P2 delineation in head and neck cancers.
Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: An international consensus was established in 2018 to standardise practice using geometric (5 + 5 mm) expansion around GTV-P for definitive radiotherapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNC). The GORTEC (French HNC Oncology and Radiotherapy Group) conducted a survey to assess the level of agreement about CTV-P2 delineation using a "formalised consensus method". Methods: The 32 proposals of the 2018 consensus on CTV-P2 and 6 additional GORTEC proposals were submitted to 13 GORTEC radiation oncologists (RO). Proposals were rated as "suitable" for median scores ≥7, "unsuitable" for scores ≤3.5 or "uncertain." The degree of agreement was high (≥85 %), moderate (75-84 %) or low (<75 %). Suitable proposals were reviewed by 40 other RO for final recommendations. Results: The 2018 proposals were "uncertain" with low degrees of agreement (41.5-69 %), except for T1 tumors, which had 89 % agreement. Five out of 6 GORTEC proposals were "suitable" and one "uncertain." The final recommendation was "suitable and to be retained" by 97.5 % of RO, as follows: To obtain CTV-P2, GORTEC recommends applying a "geo-anatomical" approach. Using the geometric concept, 10 mm-isotropic margins are applied to the GTV, for all locations but the hypopharynx (10 mm antero-posterior, laterally and 15 mm craniocaudally). CTV-P2 is further modified using the anatomical concept (anatomical barriers, dissemination routes) and accounting the benefit/risk balance and proximity of organs at risk. Conclusion: The GORTEC survey derived from the 2018 international CTV-Ps delineation consensus suggests a "geo-anatomical" approach for the delineation of CTV-P2 in HNC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.