ReviewGynecologic oncology reports2025
Exploring T-cell bispecific antibodies in gynecologic malignancy.
Review in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human lung explants as a predictive platform for evaluating the on-target, off-tumor toxicity of T cell bispecifics.iScience · 2026Article
- Bispecific antibodies in the treatment of epithelial ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer: an overview of current applications, challenges, and emerging opportunities.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynecologic cancers present a significant challenge to women's health, necessitating innovative therapeutic strategies due to high relapse rates despite conventional treatments. Immunotherapy, particularly T-cell bispecific antibodies (TCBs), offers a promising approach by redirecting the immune system to target and eliminate tumor cells. TCBs bind simultaneously to tumor-associated antigens and T cells, inducing T-cell activation and tumor cell lysis. While CAR T-cell therapies have shown success in hematologic malignancies, TCBs offer advantages such as being "off-the-shelf" products with lower rates of severe toxicities. This review provides an overview of TCBs in gynecologic malignancies, focusing on their mechanisms of action, preclinical and clinical data, and safety profiles, while also addressing the challenges and future directions. Preclinical data highlight TCBs targeting AXL, MUC1, LYPD1, and MUC16 in ovarian cancer, demonstrating potent antitumor activity. Clinical trials evaluating MUC16-targeted TCBs in ovarian and endometrial cancers are ongoing. The safety profile of TCBs includes risks such as cytokine release syndrome and on-target off-tumor toxicity, which require careful management. TCBs represent a promising immunotherapeutic approach for gynecologic cancers, warranting further investigation to optimize their efficacy and safety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.