ArticlePhotoacoustics2025
Model-informed deep-learning photoacoustic reconstruction for low-element linear array.
Article in Photoacoustics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Model-Based Joint Feature Fusion framework for limited-view photoacoustic tomography reconstruction.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Based Tomographic Imaging Reconstruction and Synthesis Methods: a Scoping Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- [Research progress of photoacoustic imaging in diagnosis of limb lymphedema].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Three-dimensional passive acoustic mapping of high intensity focused ultrasound fields using sparse synthetic apertures from rotated one-dimensional linear arrays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review of Linear-Array-Transducer-Based Volumetric Ultrasound Imaging Techniques and Their Biomedical Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photoacoustic tomography (PAT), widely applied using linear array ultrasound transducers for clinical and preclinical imaging, faces significant challenges due to sparse sensor arrangements and limited sensor pitch. These factors often compromise image quality, particularly in devices designed to have fewer sensors to reduce complexity and power consumption, such as wearable systems. Conventional reconstruction methods, including delay-and-sum and iterative model-based techniques, either lack accuracy or are computationally intensive. Recent advancements in deep learning offer promising improvements. In particular, model-based deep learning combines physics-informed priors with neural networks to enhance reconstruction quality and reduce computational demands. However, model matrix inversion during adjoint transformations presents computational challenges in model-based deep learning. To address the challenges, we introduce a simplified, efficient GE-CNN framework specifically tailored for linear array transducers. Our lightweight GE-CNN architecture significantly reduces computational demand, achieving a 4-fold reduction in model matrix size (2.09 GB for 32 elements vs. 8.38 GB for 128 elements) and accelerating processing by approximately 46.3 %, reducing the processing time from 7.88 seconds to 4.23 seconds. We rigorously evaluated this approach using synthetic models, experimental phantoms, and in-vivo rat liver imaging, highlighting the improved reconstruction performance with minimal hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.