Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40502740›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Evaluating Impulsivity as a Mechanism of Behaviour Change for 12-step Engagement during Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery.

Emily E Levitt, Kyla L Belisario, Amanda Doggett, Allan Clifton, Robert Stout, John F Kelly, James MacKillop

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily E LevittSt. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton.ORCID 0000-0002-2675-7744
Kyla L BelisarioMcMaster University.
Amanda DoggettMcMaster University.
Allan CliftonVassar College.
Robert StoutPacific Institute for Research and Evaluation.
John F KellyHarvard Medical School.
James MacKillopMcMaster University.

Funding

Investigating impulsivity and social network changes as novel mechanisms of behavior change for Alcoholics Anonymous' (AA) positive effectsR01AA025849 · NIAAA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KELLY, JOHN F., MACKILLOP, JAMES · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Mentoring in Patient-Oriented Addiction ResearchK24AA022136 · NIAAA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KELLY, JOHN F. · 2014 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAAA NIH HHS K24 AA022136NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Participation in 12-step groups (TS), such as Alcoholics Anonymous, confers benefits among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), and one candidate mechanism underlying these effects is reductions in impulsivity. Using a multidimensional assessment of impulsivity, the current study examined impulsive personality and action in a longitudinal cohort of adults with AUD initiating a significant recovery attempt. Methods: A prospective matched-sample cohort study design compared participants who reported a clinically meaningful increase in TS attendance (i.e., increase of ≥ 1 meetings/week; Results: Compared to matched controls, participants who increased TS significantly differentially reduced %DD, %HDD ( Conclusions: Increased TS attendance was associated with significant reductions in drinking and certain impulsivity traits. However, while the changes were contemporaneous, impulsivity did not explain the benefits of TS effects in early AUD recovery process. Future research should evaluate this hypothesis in larger samples and over longer follow-up periods.

Indexed as

12-stepAlcoholics AnonymousAlcohol use disorderDelay discountingDrinkingImpulsivity

Identifiers

PMID40502740
PMCPMC12154159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.