Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40502729›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2025

Spouse and Child Caregivers' Experiences of Lucid Episodes in Dementia: A Mixed Methods Approach.

Kyungmin Kim, Lauren R Bangerter, Yin Liu, Dawn M Finnie, Maria I Lapid, Joseph E Gaugler, Joan M Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyungmin KimDepartment of Child Development and Family Studies, College of Human Ecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0135-4367
Lauren R BangerterHealth Economics and Aging Research Institute, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8452-2495
Yin LiuDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA.
Dawn M FinnieKern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Maria I LapidDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Joseph E GauglerSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4797-485X
Joan M GriffinKern Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-3229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Lucid episodes (LEs) in people living with late-stage dementia have been reported anecdotally. However, how this seemingly unexpected phenomenon is experienced by family caregivers is less known. Focusing on the two most common groups of informal caregivers, spouses and adult children, this study examined variability in family caregivers' experiences with LEs-whether they exhibit differential appraisals of and responses to LEs. Research Design and Methods: Using a sample of former/bereaved and current family caregivers from UsAgainstAlzheimer's A-LIST, we conducted an online survey of spouse and child caregivers ( Results: Overall, child caregivers were more likely to witness a LE than spouse caregivers. Among former/bereaved caregivers who witnessed a LE ( Discussion and Implications: Differences between spouses and adult children in their experiences with LEs are related to their different caregiving contexts, including relationship history, living arrangements, expectations, motivations, and caregiving resources.

Indexed as

AppraisalsDementia griefInformal caregiversParadoxical lucidity

Identifiers

PMID40502729
PMCPMC12149523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.