ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
A physics-informed deep learning model for predicting beam dose distribution of intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based dose prediction for stereotactic prostate cancer radiotherapy with CyberKnife.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: We aimed to develop a physics-informed deep learning model for beam dose prediction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer. Materials and methods: A total of 100 nine-beam IMRT cases are enrolled in this study retrospectively, divided into training set (72), validation set (8), and test set (20). CT images and contour inputs are preprocessed to generate multiple feature maps for each beam angle, incorporating the dose fall-off principles in water for 6MV photons. Four beam dose prediction models using different loss are built using the U-Net framework to predict each beam dose simultaneously. Beam dose mean absolute error (MAE), beam dose gradient Euclidean distance, total dose MAE, and total dose gradient Euclidean distance are calculated to evaluate model performance. Results: The dose prediction model with beam dose loss, gradient loss, and masked loss achieves total dose MAE of 2.92 Gy, total dose gradient Euclidean distance of 1.35, beam dose MAE of 0.96 Gy, and beam dose gradient Euclidean distance of 0.30. Conclusions: This study proposes a physics-informed deep learning network specifically for the task of beam dose prediction. Additionally, this study addresses the interpretability challenges in deep learning models by employing a crosshair sampling scheme to validate the relationships between input and output channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.