ArticleiScience2025
Low-frequency cortical activity reflects context-dependent parsing of word sequences.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The spatially guided cocktail party effect shapes contralateral neural synchronization.Communications biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During speech listening, it has been hypothesized that the brain builds representations of linguistic structures like sentences, which are tracked by neural activity entrained to the rhythm of these structures. Alternatively, others proposed that these sentence-tracking neural activities may reflect the predictability or syntactic properties of individual words. Here, to disentangle the neural responses to sentences and words, we design word sequences that are parsed into different sentences in different contexts. By analyzing neural activity recorded by magnetoencephalography, we find that low-frequency neural activity strongly depends on context-the difference between MEG responses to the same word sequence in two contexts yields a low-frequency signal, which precisely tracks sentences. The predictability and syntactic properties of words can partly explain the neural response in each context but not the difference between contexts. In summary, low-frequency neural activity encodes sentences and can reliably reflect how same-word sequences are parsed in different contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.