ArticleiScience2025
Multi-analyte approach combining cfDNA sequencing and protein testing for early ovarian cancer detection.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive liquid biopsy is a promising strategy for ovarian cancer (OC) detection. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of a multi-analyte approach combining circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection with protein biomarkers for early OC detection. At 95% specificity, CA125 and ctDNA alone exhibited an overall sensitivity of 79.0% and 58.7%, respectively; however, when CA125 was combined with ctDNA, sensitivity reached 85.5%. Integrating CA125 and human epididymis protein-4 (HE4) in the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) index, yielded a sensitivity of 86.2%. When four additional proteins (HE4, cancer antigen 19-9, prolactin, and interleukin-6) were added to CA125 and ctDNA in the EarlySEEK model, sensitivity increased to 94.2%. Meanwhile, the EarlySEEK model was not affected by menopausal status, and outperformed CA125 in distinguishing benign and malignant ovarian tumors. These findings demonstrate that EarlySEEK could effectively identify OC at early stage when they are more likely to be curable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.