Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40502610›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

An Unsupervised XAI Framework for Dementia Detection with Context Enrichment.

Devesh Singh, Yusuf Brima, Fedor Levin, Martin Becker, Bjarne Hiller, Andreas Hermann, Irene Villar-Munoz, Lukas Beichert, Alexander Bernhardt, Katharina Buerger and 40 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

50 authors.

Yusuf Brima
Martin Becker
Bjarne Hiller
Irene Villar-Munoz
Lukas Beichert
Alexander Bernhardt
Katharina Buerger
Michaela Butryn
Peter Dechent
Emrah Düzel
Michael Ewers
Klaus Fliessbach
Silka D Freiesleben
Stefan Hetzer
Daniel Janowitz
Doreen Görß
Ingo Kilimann
Okka Kimmich
Christoph Laske
Johannes Levin
Andrea Lohse
Falk Luesebrink
Matthias Munk
Oliver Peters
Lukas Preis
Johannes Prudlo
Diana Prychynenko
Boris S RauchmannORCID 0000-0003-4547-6240
Nina Roy-Kluth
Anja Schneider
Louise Droste Zu Senden
Björn H Schott
Annika Spottke
Jens Wiltfang
Frank Jessen
Marc-André Weber
Stefan J Teipel
ADNI
AIBL
FTLDNI study groups

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods enhance the diagnostic efficiency of clinical decision support systems by making the predictions of a convolutional neural network's (CNN) on brain imaging more transparent and trustworthy. However, their clinical adoption is limited due to limited validation of the explanation quality. Our study introduces a framework that evaluates XAI methods by integrating neuroanatomical morphological features with CNN-generated relevance maps for disease classification. Methods: We trained a CNN using brain MRI scans from six cohorts: ADNI, AIBL, DELCODE, DESCRIBE, EDSD, and NIFD (N=3253), including participants that were cognitively normal, with amnestic mild cognitive impairment, dementia due to Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Clustering analysis benchmarked different explanation space configurations by using morphological features as proxy-ground truth. We implemented three post-hoc explanations methods: i) by simplifying model decisions, ii) explanation-by-example, and iii) textual explanations. A qualitative evaluation by clinicians (N=6) was performed to assess their clinical validity. Results: Clustering performance improved in morphology enriched explanation spaces, improving both homogeneity and completeness of the clusters. Post hoc explanations by model simplification largely delineated converters and stable participants, while explanation- by-example presented possible cognition trajectories. Textual explanations gave rule-based summarization of pathological findings. Clinicians' qualitative evaluation highlighted challenges and opportunities of XAI for different clinical applications. Conclusion: Our study refines XAI explanation spaces and applies various approaches for generating explanations. Within the context of AI-based decision support system in dementia research we found the explanations methods to be promising towards enhancing diagnostic efficiency, backed up by the clinical assessments.

Identifiers

PMID40502610
PMCPMC12154996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.