ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Stochastic Approximator of Motor Threshold (SAMT) for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Online Software and Its Performance in Clinical Studies.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe motor threshold (MT) plays a central role in probing brain excitability and individualizing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Previously, we proposed stochastic approximation (SA) as a new method for determining TMS MT and demonstrated its excellent speed and accuracy via simulations. SA also has low computational requirements and is robust to potential model flaws.
objectiveThis project aimed to develop a practical SA thresholding method and assess its performance in clinical studies.
methodsThe SA thresholding method was implemented as an online software application--SAMT (Stochastic Approximator of MT)--that incorporates features for detection of inaccurate MT estimation. Two ongoing clinical studies use SAMT and have collected 281 finger muscle MTs from 124 participants to date. SAMT's misestimation detection method marked MTs of 7 thresholding trials as inaccurate, and SAMT's performance in the remaining 274 trials was assessed by comparing the MT at each step to the threshold estimated by fitting a sigmoidal probability distribution to the complete muscle response data from the session.
resultsBy the 25th TMS pulse, 99% of the SAMT MTs deviated by less than 3.0% (relative) and 1.3% of maximum stimulator output (absolute) from the corresponding fitted sigmoid thresholds and were within their 95% confidence intervals.
conclusionsWe provide the TMS community with a new motor thresholding tool, SAMT. Combined with the prior simulation results, the experimental assessment presented here supports the practicality and accuracy of the SA thresholding method and the SAMT software.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.