ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2025
Bibliometrics of artificial intelligence applications in hepatobiliary surgery from 2014 to 2024.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping Artificial Intelligence Research in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools Across the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgical Pathway: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) in hepatobiliary surgery research has led to an increase in articles exploring its benefits. We performed a bibliometric analysis of AI applications in hepatobiliary surgery to better delineate the contemporary state of AI application in hepatobiliary surgery and potential future trajectories.
aimTo provide clinical practitioners with a reliable reference point. It offers a detailed overview of the development of AI in hepatobiliary surgery by systematically examining the contributions of authors, countries, institutions, journals, and keywords in this domain over the last 10 years.
methodsThe academic resources utilized in this study were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The search results were subsequently integrated and imported into CiteSpace and VOSviewer software for the purpose of visual analysis.
resultsThe study analyzed 2552 publications during 2014-2024. These publications collectively garnered 32 628 citations, averaging 15.66 citations per paper. The top contributor to this field was China. The USA had the highest citation count. The author with the highest citation count was Summers RM. In terms of the number of articles published, the leading journals were
conclusionThis bibliometric analysis indicates that research on AI in hepatobiliary surgery has entered a period of rapid development, particularly in the domain of disease imaging diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.