ReviewExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Can we involve pharmacists as direct service providers for people with tuberculosis? A narrative review of current evidence.
Review in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating community pharmacists in tuberculosis infection care: challenges and strategic approaches in Indonesia.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective management of tuberculosis (TB) necessitates the utilization of all available healthcare resources. Despite a paradigm shift in pharmacy practice from a product-centric to a patient-centered model, pharmacists remain underutilized in direct TB care. This narrative review explores the role of pharmacists in TB management, highlighting the effects of direct pharmaceutical care (PC) practices for TB treatment outcomes by identifying challenges and proposing strategic interventions to enhance pharmacists' engagement in TB services. Methods: We conducted a literature search across major medical databases to describe existing studies on the effect of direct PC practice on TB case management. We then discussed the challenges and potential strategies for its implementation. Results: We identified several PC models, including drug therapy monitoring, home-based care, patient counseling, and adherence support. These models mitigate drug-related problems, adverse drug reactions, and medication non-adherence. However, pharmacists face numerous barriers to providing direct TB care, including insufficient clinical training, limited interdisciplinary collaboration, a lack of organizational support and incentives, inadequate regulatory frameworks, and low awareness of pharmacists' potential contributions. To address these challenges, proposed strategies include strengthening pharmacist education and training, fostering collaboration within healthcare teams, developing standardized practice guidelines, ensuring adequate facilities and financial support, and increasing awareness among policymakers and the public on pharmacists' roles in TB care. Conclusion: Strengthening the role of pharmacists in TB management requires a multi-faceted approach involving targeted policy reforms, enhanced professional training, and interdisciplinary collaboration. A coordinated effort among national and local TB programs, healthcare institutions, professional organizations, and academic institutions is essential to optimize pharmacists' contributions to TB prevention, treatment, and patient support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.